On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> I do agree that the special problems of running huge DBs on Postgres
> might belong in a pgsql-perform list rather than any of the regular
> lists. Anyone else agree? Or does the pgsql-general list readership
> want to see this stuff?
I don't mind it in general but would use a pgsql-perform list if it
existed.
Rod
--
Why is it so easy to throw caution to the wind.
Shouldn't it be heavier and shaped like an anvil?
Jon Anderson