Re: Operators and schemas
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Operators and schemas |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0204151710080.834-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Operators and schemas (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Operators and schemas
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes: > But: do you really want to see all dumped rules, defaults, etc in that > style? Ugh... talk about loss of readability... I imagine that pg_dump could be able to figure out that certain references would be "local", so no explicit schema qualification is necessary. Thus, the only weird-looking operator invocations would be those that were also created in weird ways. In general, pg_dump should try to avoid making unnecessary schema qualifications on any object so that you can edit the dump and only change the schema name in one place. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: