Re: Operators and schemas

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Operators and schemas
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0204151710080.834-100000@peter.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Operators and schemas  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Operators and schemas  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> But: do you really want to see all dumped rules, defaults, etc in that
> style?  Ugh... talk about loss of readability...

I imagine that pg_dump could be able to figure out that certain references
would be "local", so no explicit schema qualification is necessary.
Thus, the only weird-looking operator invocations would be those that were
also created in weird ways.  In general, pg_dump should try to avoid
making unnecessary schema qualifications on any object so that you can
edit the dump and only change the schema name in one place.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RFC: Generating useful names for foreign keys and checks
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Operators and schemas