Re: Operators and schemas

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> We could make some sort of escape syntax, like

>     op1 myschema.operator(+) op2

I thought a little bit about that ... the above syntax does not work
but it looks like we could do something along the lines of
op1 OPERATOR(myschema.+) op2

where OPERATOR has to become a fully reserved keyword.

But: do you really want to see all dumped rules, defaults, etc in that
style?  Ugh... talk about loss of readability...
        regards, tom lane