Re: Operators and schemas

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Operators and schemas
Дата
Msg-id 26317.1018902662@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Operators and schemas  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: Operators and schemas  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> We could make some sort of escape syntax, like

>     op1 myschema.operator(+) op2

I thought a little bit about that ... the above syntax does not work
but it looks like we could do something along the lines of
op1 OPERATOR(myschema.+) op2

where OPERATOR has to become a fully reserved keyword.

But: do you really want to see all dumped rules, defaults, etc in that
style?  Ugh... talk about loss of readability...
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts