Re: beta3

Tom Lane writes:

> The packaging problems need to be solved before we can build a release
> candidate --- but I don't see why they should hold up beta3.  beta2 has
> the same problems, so beta3 wouldn't be a regression.

Considering the history of how-do-we-get-the-docs-in-the-tarball problem,
I'd like to see at least one beta where this works before shipping a
release candidate.  Otherwise I'll have no confidence at all that we're
not going to ship the final release with last year's docs and no man
pages.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net