Re: Ridicolus Postgresql review
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Ridicolus Postgresql review |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0109111657390.680-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Ridicolus Postgresql review (Gunnar Rønning <gunnar@polygnosis.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Ridicolus Postgresql review
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Gunnar Rønning writes: > I can't find anything in the documentation in PostgreSQL on how to make > a stored procedure return a result set. AFAIK it cannot and then it is not > really fair to claim that pgsql has stored procedures. There seems to be a rather narrow view of what a stored procedure is. A procedure is just a sequence of statements collected under a name, possibly parametrized. "Stored" simply means that it's stored in the server. PostgreSQL supports both of these things just fine. A whole 'nother thing is the ability to return result sets from functions. OK, other vendors may call the latter for "stored procedures", but that is terminological nonsense. And going out there writing an article claiming that in PostgreSQL "users do not have the ability to create their own stored procedures", without further qualification, is confusing at best. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: