Re: pg_depend

Bruce Momjian writes:

> > I'm not seeing the point.  You're essentially duplicating the information
> > that's already available in the system catalogs.  This is bound to become
> > a catastrophe the minute a user steps in and does manual surgery on some
> > catalog.  (And yes, manual surgery should still be possible.)
>
> But how then do you find the system table that uses the given oid?

It's implied by the column you're looking at.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter