Re: age() function documentation
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: age() function documentation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0104111847360.1201-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: age() function documentation (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: age() function documentation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart writes: > Why do you have a problem with the age() function? It *does* behave > differently than date subtraction, as explicitly mentioned in the docs > (preserving years, etc etc). As you see in one of the examples I posted, it does not preserve years and months. What exactly does that mean anyway? Simple subtraction also preserves years and months, as I see it. > Would we like some additional clarification in the docs perhaps? Seems > to be preferable to dropping all mention, especially since it is a > useful function. By all means. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: