Re: src/test/regress/README duplicates SGML material

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: src/test/regress/README duplicates SGML material
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0103200010570.5764-100000@peter.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на src/test/regress/README duplicates SGML material  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: src/test/regress/README duplicates SGML material  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Is it really necessary to maintain identical text in the test README
> file and in the SGML docs?  I'm sorely tempted to remove the README
> rather than double-editing yet again.

It's referenced from the INSTALL file, because people presumably won't be
able to read the HTML during installation.  Actually, the README was once
generated from the HTML version.  It can be done again, but the exact
process it kind of hazy.

--
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: elog with automatic file, line, and function
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: src/test/regress/README duplicates SGML material