Re: GNU readline and BSD license
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GNU readline and BSD license |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0012300212450.822-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: GNU readline and BSD license (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Re: GNU readline and BSD license Re: GNU readline and BSD license Re: GNU readline and BSD license |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
The Hermit Hacker writes: > Actually, IMHO, the pro to moving to libedit is that we could include it > as part of the distribution and make history a *standard* feature History already is a standard feature, you just need to have readline installed. In a world of source code users need to cope with package dependencies, and it's not like readline is the most esoteric package in the world. Gradually adding operating system level things into a package purely to convenience some users is a way to piss of the users at large because you're overriding their operating system setup. If libedit could be used as an alternative to readline depending on your operating system setup then there's nothing wrong with that. NetBSD already went the other way around and made libedit compatible with readline. But given that readline availability during the last five years was apparently just fine I don't understand this discussion at all. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: