Re: regression failure/UnixWare7.1.1/current sources

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: regression failure/UnixWare7.1.1/current sources
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0010301750260.777-100000@peter.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: regression failure/UnixWare7.1.1/current sources  (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Larry Rosenman writes:

> Hmm. I wonder why cc and gcc are doing different math.  Wierd. 

Not only that, but you get different results with the same compiler
depending on different optimization settings.  The joys of binary floating
point...

> I suspect it might have to do with what gcc was compiled on (7.0.x of
> UW).  Can we make 2 expected files and have the map file figure it
> out?

The resultmap mechanism isn't really prepared for this yet, but it is
doable I'd say.

> As to the timestamp, can we make a note that on timechange sundays
> don't run the regression test? :-) 

We've had a note in there since the last change (April was it?), which was
when I ran into this. :-)

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Larry Rosenman
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CC not getting -O passed?
Следующее
От: Peter Mount
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Current CVS broken?