Re: DROP VIEW code question

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Peter Eisentraut
Тема
Re: DROP VIEW code question
Дата
Msg-id
Pine.LNX.4.21.0010172229430.9649-100000@peter.localdomain
Ответ на
DROP VIEW code question (Mark Hollomon)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
DROP VIEW code question Mark Hollomon <mhh@mindspring.com>
Re: DROP VIEW code question Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: DROP VIEW code question Mark Hollomon <mhh@mindspring.com>
Re: DROP VIEW code question Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: DROP VIEW code question Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Mark Hollomon writes:

> Also
> 
> "DROP TABLE x, y, z" is allowed, but
> 
> "DROP VIEW x, y, z" is not.
> 
> Any reason other than historical?

I don't know how it looks now, but the "DROP TABLE x, y, z" was pretty
broken a while ago.  For example, if there was some sort of dependency
between the tables (foreign keys?) it would abort and leave an
inconsistent state.  I'm not very fond of this extension, but keep the
issue in mind.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Mark Hollomon
Дата:
Сообщение: DROP VIEW code question
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: DROP VIEW code question
FAQ