Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0002201439580.3142-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2000-02-19, Tom Lane mentioned: > What we don't seem to have is full <table value constructor> per 7.2; > we only allow VALUES ... in INSERT, whereas SQL allows it in other > constructs where a sub-SELECT would be legal, Not required by Intermediate Level. > and we don't accept > multiple rows in VALUES. For example, you should be able to write > > INSERT INTO t VALUES (1,2,3), (4,5,6), (7,8,9), ... > > but we don't accept that now. Not required either. -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: