On 1999-12-14, Thomas Lockhart mentioned:
> afaik we support the type names defined in SQL92 (like smallint),
> historical names in Postgres, and some extensions. What more do we
> need?
We need to move the standard names up in the docs and the historical ones
down. I guess what you're doing with the date/time types would also be a
good idea.
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden