Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters vs. BINARY

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Lockhart
Тема Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters vs. BINARY
Дата
Msg-id 3855F34F.9B30308E@alumni.caltech.edu
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на UNICODE characters vs. BINARY  (Gunther Schadow <gunther@aurora.rg.iupui.edu>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters vs. BINARY  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> A related question is whether we could support some more
> standard names for data types (e.g., BIGINT, SMALLINT, etc.)
> But I'm not sure there is really any standard. I would be
> willing to work a little on these data types but I'd need
> someone to hint me on who else is doing stuff and, if possible,
> where to look first (and what known mistakes to avoid.)

postgres=> create table x (i smallint);
CREATE
postgres=> create table y (j bigint);
ERROR:  Unable to locate type name 'bigint' in catalog

afaik we support the type names defined in SQL92 (like smallint),
historical names in Postgres, and some extensions. What more do we
need?
                 - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Robinson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Datatype MONEY
Следующее
От: Christof Petig
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] LONG