You are right with the currval but it is not a bug since you have not
initiated a nextval in the current session yet.
Check the list 3 - 4weeks back there was a nice thread about this and it
should hoepfully provide the answer
Darren
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Jan Poslusny wrote:
> Hi,
> select currval('sequence_name');
> with quotes should help you. But my pg 7.1.2 throws error
> "sequence_name.currval is not yet defined in this session" (possibly bug
> ?). If I use sequence before calling this (for instance "insert into
> mytable values(nextval('sequence_name'));" ), all is OK.
>
> pajout
>
>
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 11:42:31AM +0100,
> > tony <tony@animaproductions.com> wrote:
> >
> >>How does one get the last record from a series of records? I just need
> >>the id field which is a sequence field
> >>
> >
> > select max(id) from whatever;
> > (This assumes the sequence hasn't rolled over.)
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
>