> > I doubt everyone would like trading query speed for insert/update
> > speed plus index size
>
> If he is scanning through the entire index, he could do a sequential
> scan of the table, grab all the tid transaction status values, and use
> those when viewing the index. No need to store/update the transaction
> status in the index that way.
Huh ? How ? It is how you do it now. Do you expect
load several milion transaction statuses into memory,
then scan index and lookup these values ?
Missed I something ?
devik