Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Todd Graham Lewis
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling)
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.04.9904261416520.9925-100000@reflections.eng.mindspring.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling)  (Taral <taral@taral.net>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling)  (Taral <taral@taral.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 26 Apr 1999, Taral wrote:

> The most important thing we need support for is CORBA 2.2 itself, which
> when I started this, was only supported by CORBA. Also, I would like
> support for the LifeCycle service (I think), the Security service, the
> Transaction service, and maybe others I can't think of right now.

I am almost done with the first version of the GNU Transaction Server.
It uses ORBit for its own needs, but there's no reason you couldn't use
other ORBs as clients if they were appropriately modified.  I plan on
so modifying ORBit.

--
Todd Graham Lewis                        Postmaster, MindSpring Enterprises
tlewis@mindspring.net                                (800) 719-4664, x22804

"A pint of sweat will save a gallon of blood."          -- George S. Patton



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Todd Graham Lewis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling)
Следующее
От: Taral
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling)