Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
| От | Greg Smith |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.64.0806092243080.11286@westnet.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Tom Lane wrote: > It should also be pointed out that the whole thing becomes uninteresting > if we get real-time log shipping implemented. So I see absolutely no > point in spending time integrating pg_clearxlogtail now. There are remote replication scenarios over a WAN (mainly aimed at disaster recovery) that want to keep a fairly updated database without putting too much traffic over the link. People in that category really want zeroed tail+compressed archives, but probably not the extra overhead that comes with shipping smaller packets in a real-time implementation. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: