Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5245.1213062931@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Agreed. I realize why we are not zeroing those bytes (for performance),
> but can't we have the archiver zero those bytes before calling the
> 'archive_command'?
The archiver doesn't know any more about where the end-of-data is than
the archive_command does. Moreover, the archiver doesn't know whether
the archive_command cares. I think the separate module is a fine
solution.
It should also be pointed out that the whole thing becomes uninteresting
if we get real-time log shipping implemented. So I see absolutely no
point in spending time integrating pg_clearxlogtail now.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: