Re: Commit fest?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Smith
Тема Re: Commit fest?
Дата
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.64.0803162327270.14769@westnet.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Commit fest?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: Commit fest?  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Re: Commit fest?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 16 Mar 2008, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Oh, what I would really like is to be able to pull up 
> archives.postgresql.org emails based on message id so I can link to the 
> entire thread.  Unfortunately, it doesn't work there, nor does Google or 
> any of the other Postgres email archive sites.

This is something I've been looking into my own organization.  The message 
ids are at the start of the archive web pages.  For example your e-mail 
here I'm replying to begins like this if you look at the page source:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-03/msg00554.php
<!-- MHonArc v2.6.16 -->
<!--X-Subject: Re: Commit fest? -->
<!--X-From-R13: Pehpr [bzwvna <oehprNzbzwvna.hf> -->
<!--X-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 23:19:33 -0300 (ADT) -->
<!--X-Message-Id: 200803170219.m2H2JRQ11863@momjian.us -->
<!--X-Content-Type: text/plain -->
<!--X-Reference: 20681.1205719990@sss.pgh.pa.us -->
<!--X-Head-End-->

I was thinking of writing something that scraped the archives building a 
lookup table out of this information.  What would be nice is if the 
X-Message-Id and X-Reference were both put into the regular HTML for 
future archived messages so that it's more likely tools like Google could 
search based on them.  A brief glance at the MHonArc documentation 
suggests that could be run to re-covert any existing messages that are 
still available in order to add to those even.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Cristian Gafton
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Single table forcing sequential scans on query plans
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Remove hacks for old bad qsort() implementations?