Re: pg_dump additional options for performance
| От | Greg Smith |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.64.0802261408480.20468@westnet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Tom Lane wrote: > What are you imagining here ... a plain SQL script containing > database-independent INSERT commands? That's going to suck compared > to COPY no matter what. Think 100GB+ of data that's in a CSV or delimited file. Right now the best import path is with COPY, but it won't execute very fast as a single process. Splitting the file manually will take a long time (time that could be spend loading instead) and substantially increase disk usage, so the ideal approach would figure out how to load in parallel across all available CPUs against that single file. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: