Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch
Дата
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.02A.9910251042430.8338-100000@Krabba.DoCS.UU.SE
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch  (Mike Mascari <mascarim@yahoo.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 24 Oct 1999, Mike Mascari wrote:

> Hmm, this is where I'm getting the oid's:
> 
> DATABASE -- pg_database
> INDEX -- pg_class
> RULE -- pg_rewrite
> SEQUENCE -- pg_class
> TABLE -- pg_class
> TYPE -- pg_type
> VIEW -- pg_class
> COLUMN -- pg_attribute
> AGGREGATE -- pg_aggregate
> FUNCTION -- pg_proc
> OPERATOR -- pg_operator
> TRIGGER -- pg_trigger
> 
> So in the example you gave above, you could put a comment
> on each of the two functions which compose the operator
> and a command on the operator itself.

Very nice, BUT: In the old psql the assumption was that operator comments
are keyed on the underlying function(s?). Since a lot of operators seem to
have comments on them by default, one would have to change this somehow.
Try \do and see for yourself. The fix should be rather simple but I'm not
sure where those descriptions are generated actually.
-Peter

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders vaeg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch
Следующее
От: "Nguyen, Thuan X"
Дата:
Сообщение: