Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch
Дата
Msg-id 14803.940829793@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch  (Mike Mascari <mascarim@yahoo.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Mike Mascari <mascarim@yahoo.com> writes:
>> Does this field exist for all previous postgres releases (specifically,
>> 6.2,6.3, and 6.4) ??

> And of course, it appears also in 6.4.x, so I assume that it was added 
> between the 6.2 and 6.3 releases. Is that going to be a problem?

For Peter's purposes, it's unnecessary to worry about anything older
than 6.4, since he's depending on an up-to-date libpq and current libpq
won't talk to anything older than 6.4.

Byron might still care about 6.2 ... I dunno whether ODBC currently
really works with 6.2 or not, or whether it needs to keep doing so.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Mike Mascari
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch