Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!?
Дата
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.02A.10001311438530.12762-100000@Hund.DoCS.UU.SE
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!?  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!?  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, The Hermit Hacker wrote:

> On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 29 Jan 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> > > However, I can't find any macro that uses this like makeNode does with
> > > its pasteing.  I would perhaps move it to a _deadcode directory and see
> > > what happens.  Or should we enable it?
> > 
> > Please no more _deadcode. Why do we have CVS?
> > 
> > (In the same spirit it would also be nice to tag NOT_USED sections with a
> > version number, so it could be yanked two or three releases past.)
> 
> Why not just yank it period?  'cvs diff' will show what was yanked, and
> the log message could say just 'yanked NOT_USED code from source tree'...

I *suspect* the purpose of some of these sections is that if it turns out
somebody needed them for their application, we could just tell them to
re-enable them there and there. If this is the case, then it has gone way
past abuse already, though. Some parts of been NOT_USED for many years and
most likely don't work anymore.


-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders vaeg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: The Hermit Hacker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!?
Следующее
От: The Hermit Hacker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!?