Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kris Jurka
Тема Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method
Дата
Msg-id Pine.BSO.4.56.0508081907070.29622@leary.csoft.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> So the short answer is possibly "You build the tests and we'll run 'em."
> 

Automated performance testing seems like a bad idea for the buildfarm.  
Consider in my particular case I've got three members that all happen to 
be running in virtual machines on the same host.  What virtualization does 
for performance and what happens when all three members are running at the 
same time renders any results beyond useless.  Certainly soliciting the 
pgbuildfarm-members@pgfoundry.org list is good idea, but I don't think 
automating this testing is a good idea without more knowledge of the 
machines and their other workloads.

Kris Jurka



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method