Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method

Tom Lane wrote:

>Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>  
>
>>So the short answer is possibly "You build the tests and we'll run 'em."
>>    
>>
>
>The availability of the buildfarm certainly makes it a lot more feasible
>to do performance tests on a variety of platforms.  So, who wants to
>knock something together?
>
>I suppose we would usually be interested in one-time tests, rather than
>something repeated every time CVS is touched.  How might that sort of
>requirement fit into the buildfarm software design?
>
>
>  
>

I'll give it some thought. Maybe a unique name would do the trick.

cheers

andrew