Tom Lane wrote:
>Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>
>
>>So the short answer is possibly "You build the tests and we'll run 'em."
>>
>>
>
>The availability of the buildfarm certainly makes it a lot more feasible
>to do performance tests on a variety of platforms. So, who wants to
>knock something together?
>
>I suppose we would usually be interested in one-time tests, rather than
>something repeated every time CVS is touched. How might that sort of
>requirement fit into the buildfarm software design?
>
>
>
>
I'll give it some thought. Maybe a unique name would do the trick.
cheers
andrew