Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> So the short answer is possibly "You build the tests and we'll run 'em."

The availability of the buildfarm certainly makes it a lot more feasible
to do performance tests on a variety of platforms.  So, who wants to
knock something together?

I suppose we would usually be interested in one-time tests, rather than
something repeated every time CVS is touched.  How might that sort of
requirement fit into the buildfarm software design?
        regards, tom lane