On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Chad R. Larson wrote:
> >etc. They should _only_ be able to add/alter/drop tables within their
> >_own_ database.
>
> So, create a database for the user as the user, but deny him the ability to
> create databases or users.
>
> Then he can dick with his own database to his heart's desire, but that
> would be his only sandbox.
Hey Chad && list,
This is what I ended up doing for a solution.
Yes, very workable. It was just a few more steps than
I expected (mostly because I thought I was missing
something silly). :)
Thanks for all your responses!
Benny
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You see, we're leveraging the synergies of our existing open source
solution, without reliance on a single vendor.
Or in english: We use samba cause NT sucks ass.
--greg@rage.net