Re: possible constraint bug?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephan Szabo
Тема Re: possible constraint bug?
Дата
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.10.10008181254240.2619-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на possible constraint bug?  (Thomas Swan <tswan@olemiss.edu>)
Ответы Re: possible constraint bug?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
This is particular to postgres, although the 
SQL behavior would have either dropped 
the constraint or prevented the drop in the
first place.

There's been some talk of an ALTER FUNCTION
that would let you change the code behind
a function without a drop/create.

Generally you have to re-generate things that
reference functions that have been dropped
and re-created.  This is a pain right now
for constraints, since it requires a dump
and restore of the table.

On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Thomas Swan wrote:

> 
> Using Postgresql 7.0.2 (Linux x86, 2.2.16)
> 
> CERATE FUNCTION foo(text)
> 
> CREATE TABLE bar(
>          fud TEXT CHECK (foo(fud))
> );
> 
> DROP FUNCTION foo(TEXT);
> CREATE FUNCTION foo( .....);
> 
> INSERT INTO bar VALUES ('Hey'); results in the following error
> 
> ERROR init_fcache: Cache lookup failed for procedure 128384
> 
> Is this particular to postgres or is this a normal SQLxx standard behavior?



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Swan
Дата:
Сообщение: possible constraint bug?
Следующее
От: Don Baccus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: possible constraint bug?