Re: possible constraint bug?
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: possible constraint bug? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200010121924.PAA13798@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: possible constraint bug? (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: possible constraint bug?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Is this addressed in 7.1?
>
> This is particular to postgres, although the
> SQL behavior would have either dropped
> the constraint or prevented the drop in the
> first place.
>
> There's been some talk of an ALTER FUNCTION
> that would let you change the code behind
> a function without a drop/create.
>
> Generally you have to re-generate things that
> reference functions that have been dropped
> and re-created. This is a pain right now
> for constraints, since it requires a dump
> and restore of the table.
>
> On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Thomas Swan wrote:
>
> >
> > Using Postgresql 7.0.2 (Linux x86, 2.2.16)
> >
> > CERATE FUNCTION foo(text)
> >
> > CREATE TABLE bar(
> > fud TEXT CHECK (foo(fud))
> > );
> >
> > DROP FUNCTION foo(TEXT);
> > CREATE FUNCTION foo( .....);
> >
> > INSERT INTO bar VALUES ('Hey'); results in the following error
> >
> > ERROR init_fcache: Cache lookup failed for procedure 128384
> >
> > Is this particular to postgres or is this a normal SQLxx standard behavior?
>
>
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: