Simmultanous Connections (fwd)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Vince Vielhaber
Тема Simmultanous Connections (fwd)
Дата
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.05.10001101108300.13082-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Simmultanous Connections (fwd)  (Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop@range.infoplease.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Simmultanous Connections (fwd)  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Can anyone here help?

Vince.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 08:52:06 +0000
From: Jude Weaver <exec@shreve.net>
To: webmaster@postgresql.org
Subject: Simmultanous Connections

We are a company that writes academic software . We are converting our
software to use  either PostgreSQL or MySQL. We are leaning toward
PostgreSQL, but, I still have several questions.
I hope someone can answer these for me.

1.  I have read the Q&A for postgreSQL and would like to know the
difference between a temporary    and a permanant connection. Do you have a connection when you open
the database or only when     the frontend sends a job to the backend? If 32 people are running
a module that opens a database      is that 32 connections or will it vary as users read and write to
the database?

2. I saw in the Q&A that to run more than 32 simmultanous connects could
be a big drain on our re-   sources. Our  Linux boxes , in general, are Intel 166 to 500s, 128MG
of RAM and 6.2 to 13 GIG.   Can anyone tell me roughly how much resources per connection does
PostgreSQL use?

3. If I have 90 teachers posting grades at the same time, (the grade
posting program opens 5 dif-   ferent databases) and  25 secretaries and administrators poking
around in assorted databases    looking at information, will postgresql handle that much traffic?

I would appreciate any information you can give me,
Thank you - Jude Weaver.




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Number of index fields configurable
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Number of index fields configurable