RE: [BUG] Unexpected action when publishing partition tables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com
Тема RE: [BUG] Unexpected action when publishing partition tables
Дата
Msg-id OS0PR01MB571638518960C60D0148DB2694DD9@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [BUG] Unexpected action when publishing partition tables  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [BUG] Unexpected action when publishing partition tables  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thursday, September 16, 2021 6:05 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
> > On Tuesday, September 14, 2021 10:41 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 11:38 AM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the comment.
> > Attach new version patches which clean the table at the end.
> >
> 
> + * For partitioned table contained in the publication, we must
> + * invalidate all partitions contained in the respective partition
> + * trees, not just the one explicitly mentioned in the publication.
> 
> Can we slightly change the above comment as: "For the partitioned tables, we
> must invalidate all partitions contained in the respective partition hierarchies,
> not just the one explicitly mentioned in the publication. This is required
> because we implicitly publish the child tables when the parent table is
> published."
> 
> Apart from this, the patch looks good to me.
> 
> I think we need to back-patch this till v13. What do you think? 

I agreed.

Attach patches for back-branch, each has passed regression tests and pgindent.

Best regards,
Hou zj


Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: relation OID in ReorderBufferToastReplace error message
Следующее
От: Bharath Rupireddy
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: improve pg_receivewal code