Re: Should this require CASCADE?

> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> > With all this dependency stuff, what happens with the ALTER
> TABLE / DROP NOT
> > NULL syntax we came up with?
>
> Nothing, AFAICS.  NOT NULL doesn't have any dependency implications.

What about the primary keys that I mentioned?  In the current
implementation, it's restrict-only.

Chris