Hello, Fabien
I am attaching patch v7.
> Yes, I agree. a >= 10000 does not make much sense... If you want uniform you should use random(), not call
random_zipfianwith a = 10000. Basically it suggests that too large values of "a" should be rejected. Not sure where to
putthe limit, though.
I set upper bound for parameter to be equal to 1000.
>
> Yes, as a general principle I think that the documentation should reflect the implementation.
Documentation have been updated, I have removed algorithms descriptions and put references to them there.
—
Thanks and Regards,
Alik Khilazhev
Postgres Professional:
http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers