Re: Setting rpath on llvmjit.so?
| От | Jason Petersen |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Setting rpath on llvmjit.so? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | F5CCC0AB-67FD-404F-AEB4-3D6A9302A087@citusdata.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Setting rpath on llvmjit.so? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Setting rpath on llvmjit.so?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Apr 18, 2018, at 8:57 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:I'm wondering whether that will result in expending a lot of effort to move from a poorly-supported build system to a different poorly-supported build system.
So the tooling around people using it is there and it’s used by some very large and mature projects covering a variety of domains: I don’t know if it’s “poorly supported” (the documentation leaves something to be desired), but if CMake has trouble down the line a lot of very important projects will be in trouble. It seems like a pretty safe bet given the sheer inertia of the list above.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: