Re: Does Type Have = Operator?
От | David E. Wheeler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Does Type Have = Operator? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | F434008C-5404-4974-A2D8-E6601B3333F2@justatheory.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Does Type Have = Operator? (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Does Type Have = Operator?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On May 11, 2016, at 10:34 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not clear enough on your intended usage to know whether these > operators are a good fit, but they are sitting there waiting to be > used if they do fit. Huh. I haven’t had any problems with IS DISTINCT FROM for rows, except for the situation in which a failure is thrown becausethe types vary, say between TEXT and CITEXT. That can drive the tester crazy, since it says something like: Results differ beginning at row 3: have: (44,Anna) want: (44,Anna) But overall I think that’s okay; the tester really does want to make sure the type is correct. Thanks, David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: