Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd timestamp index possible?)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Page
Тема Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd timestamp index possible?)
Дата
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4306882@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd timestamp index possible?)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: 02 October 2004 19:23
> To: Peter Eisentraut
> Cc: Bruno Wolff III; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Mislabeled timestamp functions (was
> Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd timestamp index possible?)
>
> > I'd prefer if all users of 8.0 were guaranteed to have the
> same catalog.
>
> Well, there's something to be said for that viewpoint too.
> Anyone else feel the same?

It makes sense to me. Especially with hordes of win32 newbies gathering
at the door it'll be one less variable to think about.

Regards, Dave.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Gavin Sherry
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1
Следующее
От: Bruno Wolff III
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd