Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruno Wolff III
Тема Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd
Дата
Msg-id 20041002200451.GA14830@wolff.to
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd  (Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>)
Ответы Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd  (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 10:43:01 +0200, Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >I wrote:
> >Do you see any other mislabelings?
> 
> I don't but I think that the concept of immutable shall be expanded.
> I mean I can use safely a date_trunc immutable in a query ( I think this
> is a sort of "immutable per statement" ) but not in a index definition
> ( the index mantainance is affected by the current timezonesettings ).
> So may be another modifier shall be introduced that reflect the "immutable
> per statement"

There has been such a distinction for a major release or two. "Stable"
is how you mark a function that will return the same value within a
single transaction.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Dave Page"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd timestamp index possible?)
Следующее
От: Chris Browne
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: AIX and V8 beta 3