Re: libpq, PQexecPrepared, data size sent to FE vs. FETCH_COUNT

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alex Goncharov
Тема Re: libpq, PQexecPrepared, data size sent to FE vs. FETCH_COUNT
Дата
Msg-id E1OGsQ2-000FHM-FG@daland.home
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на libpq, PQexecPrepared, data size sent to FE vs. FETCH_COUNT  (Alex Goncharov <alex-goncharov@comcast.net>)
Ответы Re: libpq, PQexecPrepared, data size sent to FE vs. FETCH_COUNT  (Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>)
Re: libpq, PQexecPrepared, data size sent to FE vs. FETCH_COUNT  (Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@toroid.org>)
Re: libpq, PQexecPrepared, data size sent to FE vs. FETCH_COUNT  (Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com>)
Re: libpq, PQexecPrepared, data size sent to FE vs. FETCH_COUNT  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
,--- I/Alex (Mon, 24 May 2010 12:25:18 -0400) ----*
| No equivalent of FETCH_COUNT is available at the libpq level, so I
| assume that the interface I am using is smart enough not to send
| gigabytes of data to FE.
| 
| Where does the result set (GBs of data) reside after I call
| PQexecPrepared?  On BE, I hope?

Sorry for asking again...

No sarcasm meant: is there no straightforward answer here?  Or nobody
is certain?  Or a wrong list?

Thanks,

-- Alex -- alex-goncharov@comcast.net --



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Florian Pflug
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user
Следующее
От: Nicolas Barbier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user