On Apr 29, 2010, at 3:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>> Objections to commit?
>
> This is not the time to be hacking stuff like this. You haven't even
> demonstrated that there's a significant performance issue here.
I tend to agree that this point of the cycle isn't a good one to be making changes, but your performance statement
confusesme. If a fairly small patch means we can avoid un-necessary reads why shouldn't we avoid them?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect jim@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net