Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bossart, Nathan
Тема Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)?
Дата
Msg-id E053E257-E99F-46A6-B2EF-C0E4BB1F6398@amazon.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)?  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 1/11/22, 10:06 AM, "John Naylor" <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> I pushed this with one small change -- I felt the comment didn't need
> to explain the warning message, since it now simply matches the coding
> more exactly. Also, v5 was a big enough change from v4 that I put
> Nathan as the first author.

Thanks!

Nathan

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: John Naylor
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)?
Следующее
От: Jacob Champion
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: fix crash with Python 3.11