Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Rakesh Kumar
Тема Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases
Дата
Msg-id DM2PR05MB6228322B1A4220BDF495E0D8CC10@DM2PR05MB622.namprd05.prod.outlook.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases  (Venkata B Nagothi <nag1010@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases  (Venkata B Nagothi <nag1010@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general

________________________________________
From: Venkata B Nagothi <nag1010@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 17:25
To: Rakesh Kumar
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Multi tenancy : schema vs databases

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 5:18 AM, Rakesh Kumar <rakeshkumar464@outlook.com<mailto:rakeshkumar464@outlook.com>> wrote:

Hi

I would like to know which technique is better for supporting multi-tenancy=
 applications, going upto hundreds or even thousands of tenants.

1 - One database with difference schemas (one schema per tenant)
or
2 - One database per tenant.

Did you mean one database with-in a postgresql cluster ?

Yes.  Say something like this within a PG cluster

db4978
db6234
...
100s of such databases.


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Hanne Moa
Дата:
Сообщение: Getting the currently used sequence for a SERIAL column
Следующее
От: Adrian Klaver
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: isnull() function in pgAdmin3