Re: [HACKERS] Optional message to user when terminating/cancellingbackend

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Satyanarayana Narlapuram
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Optional message to user when terminating/cancellingbackend
Дата
Msg-id DM2PR03MB41608EB305664ED1FF4855E91C40@DM2PR03MB416.namprd03.prod.outlook.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Optional message to user when terminating/cancelling backend  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Optional message to user when terminating/cancellingbackend  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers

+1.

 

This really helps PostgreSQL Azure service as well. When we are doing the upgrades to the service, instead of abruptly terminating the sessions we can provide this message.

 

Thanks,

Satya

 

From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Pavel Stehule
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 11:41 AM
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Optional message to user when terminating/cancelling backend

 

 

 

2017-06-19 20:24 GMT+02:00 Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>:

When terminating, or cancelling, a backend it’s currently not possible to let
the signalled session know *why* it was dropped.  This has nagged me in the
past and now it happened to come up again, so I took a stab at this.  The
attached patch implements the ability to pass an optional text message to the
signalled session which is included in the error message:

  SELECT pg_terminate_backend(<pid> [, message]);
  SELECT pg_cancel_backend(<pid> [, message]);

Right now the message is simply appended on the error message, not sure if
errdetail or errhint would be better? Calling:

  select pg_terminate_backend(<pid>, 'server rebooting');

..leads to:

  FATAL:  terminating connection due to administrator command: "server rebooting"

Omitting the message invokes the command just like today.

The message is stored in a new shmem area which is checked when the session is
aborted.  To keep things simple a small buffer is kept per backend for the
message.  If deemed too costly, keeping a central buffer from which slabs are
allocated can be done (but seemed rather complicated for little gain compared
to the quite moderate memory spend.)

cheers ./daniel

 

+1

 

very good idea

 

Pavel

 




--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

 

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Preliminary results for proposed new pgindentimplementation
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Decimal64 and Decimal128