On 28-Feb-07, at 3:41 PM, Tim Pizey wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 February 2007 10:50, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> James Im wrote:
>>> I just find out that I cannot continue using a connection when I use
>>> autocommit=false and that an sql insert failed.
>>
>> That's intended behavior in PostgreSQL.
> [snip]
> This is new behaviour in version 8, I believe.
>
No, this has been around since 7.x
> I think this behaviour is unique to Postgresql?
>
Possibly
> Melati was developed with Postgresql version 6 as the target dbms
> back in 2000, since then it has been extended to work with the
> other common
> dbmsen, but now it looks like it won't work with V8, without quite
> a bit of
> rework.
>
> Is this behaviour specified by a standard?
>
> What are the advantages?
>
The advantage is that a transaction is atomic.
You can continue to use the connection, you simply have to rollback
the transaction after the error and start over.
You can also use savepoints.
> yours
> Tim Pizey
>
> --
> http://melati.org/ - the flower of Java.
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that
> your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>