Re: no universally correct setting for fsync
| От | Bernd Helmle |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: no universally correct setting for fsync |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | D9EB8B28CCC10C46B7DD3472@amenophis обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: no universally correct setting for fsync (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
--On 7. Mai 2010 19:49:15 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de> writes: >> I've recently even started to wonder if the performance gain with >> fsync=off is still that large on modern hardware. While testing large >> migration procedures to a new version some time ago (on an admitedly >> fast storage) i forgot here and then to turn it off, without a >> significant degradation in performance. > > That says to me either that you're using a battery-backed write cache, > or your fsyncs don't really work (no write barriers or something like > that). > Well, yes, BBU present and proven storage. Maybe i'm wrong, but it seems battery backed write caches aren't that seldom even in low end systems nowadays. -- Thanks Bernd
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: