Re: Cirrus-ci is lowering free CI cycles - what to do with cfbot, etc?
От | Tristan Partin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Cirrus-ci is lowering free CI cycles - what to do with cfbot, etc? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CUN9O1FGBHA1.3R7SSO36UFF8K@gonk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Cirrus-ci is lowering free CI cycles - what to do with cfbot, etc? (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Cirrus-ci is lowering free CI cycles - what to do with cfbot, etc?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon Aug 7, 2023 at 9:15 PM CDT, Andres Freund wrote: > FWIW: with the patches applied, the "credit costs" in cirrus CI are roughly > like the following (depends on caching etc): > > task costs in credits > linux-sanity: 0.01 > linux-compiler-warnings: 0.05 > linux-meson: 0.07 > freebsd : 0.08 > linux-autoconf: 0.09 > windows : 0.18 > macos : 0.28 > total task runtime is 40.8 > cost in credits is 0.76, monthly credits of 50 allow approx 66.10 runs/month I am not in the loop on the autotools vs meson stuff. How much longer do we anticipate keeping autotools around? Seems like it could be a good opportunity to reduce some CI usage if autotools were finally dropped, but I know there are still outstanding tasks to complete. Back of the napkin math says autotools is about 12% of the credit cost, though I haven't looked to see if linux-meson and linux-autotools are 1:1. -- Tristan Partin Neon (https://neon.tech)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: