Hi,
On 2023-08-08 10:25:52 -0500, Tristan Partin wrote:
> On Mon Aug 7, 2023 at 9:15 PM CDT, Andres Freund wrote:
> > FWIW: with the patches applied, the "credit costs" in cirrus CI are roughly
> > like the following (depends on caching etc):
> >
> > task costs in credits
> > linux-sanity: 0.01
> > linux-compiler-warnings: 0.05
> > linux-meson: 0.07
> > freebsd : 0.08
> > linux-autoconf: 0.09
> > windows : 0.18
> > macos : 0.28
> > total task runtime is 40.8
> > cost in credits is 0.76, monthly credits of 50 allow approx 66.10 runs/month
>
> I am not in the loop on the autotools vs meson stuff. How much longer do we
> anticipate keeping autotools around?
I think it depends in what fashion. We've been talking about supporting
building out-of-tree modules with "pgxs" for at least a 5 year support
window. But the replacement isn't yet finished [1], so that clock hasn't yet
started ticking.
> Seems like it could be a good opportunity to reduce some CI usage if
> autotools were finally dropped, but I know there are still outstanding tasks
> to complete.
>
> Back of the napkin math says autotools is about 12% of the credit cost,
> though I haven't looked to see if linux-meson and linux-autotools are 1:1.
The autoconf task is actually doing quite useful stuff right now, leaving the
use of configure aside, as it builds with address sanitizer. Without that it'd
be a lot faster. But we'd loose, imo quite important, coverage. The tests
would run a bit faster with meson, but it'd be overall a difference on the
margins.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
[1] https://github.com/anarazel/postgres/tree/meson-pkgconfig