Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alexander Korotkov
Тема Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands
Дата
Msg-id CAPpHfduhHm+4yeObsj9wK4iZvV2Ve5xcr6BwZDFiNBYbE1PfLg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
Ответы Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands
Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 4:23 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 10:51:24PM +0300, Dmitry Koval wrote:
> > 30.04.2024 23:15, Justin Pryzby пишет:
> > > Is this issue already fixed ?
> > > I wasn't able to reproduce it.  Maybe it only happened with earlier
> > > patch versions applied ?
> >
> > I think this was fixed in commit [1].
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/fcf80c5d5f0f3787e70fca8fd029d2e08a923f91
>
> I tried to reproduce it at fcf80c5d5f~, but couldn't.
> I don't see how that patch would fix it anyway.
> I'm hoping Alexander can confirm what happened.

This problem is only relevant for an old version of fix [1], which
overrides schemas for new partitions.  That version was never
committed.

> The other remaining issues I'm aware of are for EXCLUDING STATISTICS and
> refusing to ALTER if the owners don't match.

These two are in my list.  I'm planning to work on them in the next few days.

> Note that the error that led to "EXCLUDING IDENTITY" is being discused
> over here:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3b8a9dc1-bbc7-0ef5-6863-c432afac7d59@gmail.com
>
> It's possible that once that's addressed, the exclusion should be
> removed here, too.

+1

Links.
1. https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/edfbd846-dcc1-42d1-ac26-715691b687d3%40postgrespro.ru

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: A problem about partitionwise join
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Removing unneeded self joins