Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alexander Korotkov
Тема Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information
Дата
Msg-id CAPpHfduAULvB-sX3UZ7STorpZbc5NxX62x3x+K63gE8+sFbLPA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
On 06.11.2013 17:36, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Just for my own illumination, can someone explain this bit?

+ If a posting list is too large to store in-line in a key entry, a posting tree
+ is created. A posting tree is a B-tree structure, where the ItemPointer is
+ used as the key. At the leaf-level, item pointers are stored compressed, in
+ "varbyte encoding".

I think the first ItemPointer mentioned (the key) refers to a TID
pointing to the index, and "item pointers stored compressed" refers to
the TIDs pointing to the heap (the data).  Is that correct?

No, they both refer to TIDs pointing to the heap.


I'm also interested in the "FIXME explain varbyte encoding" explanation
currently missing, if somebody can write it down ...

Alexander's latest version filled in that explanation (haven't read it myself yet)

off-list

It appears to be not actually off-list, sorry :) 
 
What's your plans about GIN now? I tried to rebase packed posting lists with head. But I found that you've changed interface of placeToPage function. That's conflicts with packed posting lists, because dataPlaceToPageLeaf needs not only offset number to describe place to insert item pointer. Do you like to commit rework of handling GIN incomplete splits before?
 
------
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.  

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: new unicode table border styles for psql