Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alexander Korotkov
Тема Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points
Дата
Msg-id CAPpHfdsyZYU7fV-Yp8uWbrOnxXL954rUA3Z3VqjoP=DyoqJdzg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
Described differences leads to incorrect behaviour of GiST index. 
The question is: what is correct way to fix it? Should on_pb also use FP* or consistent method should behave like on_pb?

Any comments on this? Current behaviour definitely indicates a bug, and I'm ready to fix it. The only question: is this bug in on_pb or gist?

------
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov. 

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost
Следующее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Google Summer of Code? Call for mentors.